Re: Aprilis LLDB/NetBSD

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Apr 4, 10:24pm, n54%gmx.com@localhost (Kamil Rytarowski) wrote:
-- Subject: Aprilis LLDB/NetBSD

| Hello,
| 
| I've dropped few paragraphs on the NetBSD status:
| 
| https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_the_first_bsd_introducing
| 
| I'm going to focus on the following tasks till Easter holidays
|  * watchpoints support,
|  * floating point registers support,
|  * enhance core(5) and make it work for multiple threads
|  * introduce PT_SETSTEP and PT_CLEARSTEP in ptrace(2)
|  * research F_GETPATH in fcntl(2)
| 
| On the second half of this month I will move on to:
|  * support threads in the NetBSD Process Plugin
| 
| 
| Upstream LLVM+Clang+LLDB version r. 299109 (no local patches) verification*=
| :
| 
| =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
| Test Result Summary
| =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
| Test Methods:       1247
| Reruns:                0
| Success:             622
| Expected Failure:     23
| Failure:              79
| Error:                97
| Exceptional Exit:      0
| Unexpected Success:    1
| Skip:                424
| Timeout:               1
| Expected Timeout:      0
| 
| http://netbsd.org/~kamil/lldb/check-lldb-r299109-2017-04-04.txt
| 
| * I'm still using pkgsrc-wip and it might affect the score compared to
| clean out of pkgsrc build.

What enhancements do we need for the core format?
Sounds good, do you have the PT_{G,S}ETSTEP functional description somewhere?

christos