[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
> it is not ever going to be safe to remove these entirely from libc.
> consider the following case:
> - build a binary on netbsd-5 that depends upon these symbols
> - run this binary on a netbsd-6 system that only has these
> symbols in libgcc, and they won't be resolved.
> i'd guess that you need to leave them in libc.so as a weak symbol
> for all eternity, or at least until we bump libc.so.
Thanks for clarification. I'll check if __weak_alias() works once things
settle down. (There seem strong oppositions against adding more weak symbols,
We should consider the static library case too.
Masao Uebayashi / Tombi Inc. / Tel: +81-90-9141-4635
Main Index |
Thread Index |