Re: 4.0 vs nested functions

[der Mouse <mouse%Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA@localhost>]

> I would try under stock gcc just in case, then complain to the gcc
> people.

'k, thanks.

> However, you may not get much traction because nested functions are
> not, after all, C.

No...but they are a documented, and presumably supported, part of gcc -
and I don't want to change the semantics of nested functions anyway,
just of -Wmissing-prototypes.

/~\ The ASCII                           der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML               mouse%rodents.montreal.qc.ca@localhost
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B