[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: 4.0 vs nested functions
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 11:02:12AM -0500, der Mouse wrote:
> I use nested functions moderately heavily in my code. Under 1.4T, I
> defined them with "static". Under 3.1, I used "auto".
> Under 4.0, there appears to be no way to define them without upsetting
> -Wmissing-prototypes, except with a redundant prototype declaration.
> What's my correct action here? Shound I generate a NetBSD PR? Should
> I send mail to gcc-bugs anyway?
I would try under stock gcc just in case, then complain to the gcc
However, you may not get much traction because nested functions are
not, after all, C.
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |