Re: Moving NetBSD from CVS to svn|git|hg|fossil

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:57:51AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Agreed that with git or hg it is straightforward to map existing
> practices.

I disagree. At least is not a clear, single and non-controversial mapping.
Even with svn (where the mapping is nearly verbatim) we would have to
define branch/tag naming shemes.

And "current practices" have to include the releng workflow.

Martin