tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Broken implicit DEPENDS?



* On 2023-11-16 at 22:39 GMT, Thomas Klausner wrote:

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 08:57:44PM +0000, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
I think at the very least we need to tighten up any packages that are listed
as BUILDLINK_DEPMETHOD=build and ensure their files are not buildlinked.

I don't understand this part - I thought we mostly used this setting
for packages providing static libraries - these need to be buildlinked
to be found.

How about if we just exclude .so* and .dylib*?

FWIW my test bulk build is already showing quite a lot of packages that are broken. I think we're only getting away with this because users will likely already have the libraries installed via other deps.

--
Jonathan Perkin   -   mnx.io   -   pkgsrc.smartos.org
Open Source Complete Cloud   www.tritondatacenter.com


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index