On 26/8/20 20:42, Thomas Klausner wrote: > It seems mailman 3.3.1 is out the new major branch. Can I interest you > in packaging that? :) Migration to Mailman 3 is something I should do someday, but so far mailman2 is good enough to me. Spare time is limited, I am afraid. It is true that being "induced" to package mailman3 for pkgsrc could be the push I need to actually migrate to new mailman. $DEITY knows that I need some push for that, it is in my to do list for years. That said, I must say that I am afraid I don't get the point of doing pkgsrc packages of Python packages that can be easily installed via regular "pip" (the python package index/installer). I am open/eager to be convinced :-). PS: I see a "mailman3" directory in WIP. What is missing to become a regular pkgsrc package? Thanks for your diligence. -- Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ jcea%jcea.es@localhost - https://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ jabber / xmpp:jcea%jabber.org@localhost _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature