Re: Please help to fix outdated SUBST blocks

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>]

On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 09:07:09PM +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
> I agree that having the stricter shell portability check generates more
> packages that fail to build.  The point is that before, they succeeded
> to build but under wrong assumptions.  I prefer to have binary packages
> without these easy-to-detect bugs.

The majority of the cases I have seen for the stricter checks are noise.
That doesn't even include the whole autotool source issue, but just that
the majority of the files affected never were used at all.

Joerg