On Sun 27 Oct 2019 at 16:38:14 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > On 27.10.2019 15:16, Rhialto wrote: > > On Sun 27 Oct 2019 at 11:02:18 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > >> qbrz is qt4 based (at least in trunk). Maybe it would not be too > >> difficult to help them to upgrade to qt5 if you need it. > > > > It also doesn't seem to be compatible with py3, from a quick try... > > > > It obviously needs a new maintainer. I had some chats with a guy who's active in brz (https://bugs.launchpad.net/brz/+bug/1849971) who seems to have done most commits in qbrz, but that was itself over a year ago. I started some porting, but got stuck; see https://bugs.launchpad.net/qbrz/+bug/1850054 . > Fedora does not note it in the bzr->brz plan. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceBazaarWithBreezy Hmmm. I want Breezy mainly because it is used for storing ctwm (https://launchpad.net/ctwm) which I co-develop (and which is also copied into NetBSD once in a while). And for all these branchy histories one really needs a graphical viewer to keep track of things :-( -Olaf. -- Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- rhialto at falu dot nl ___ Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on \X/ no account be allowed to do the job. --Douglas Adams, "THGTTG"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature