[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: discussion about making cups default for gtk
My $0.02 on the subject:
I do not use nor wish to use "CUPS" or any sub- or superset thereof.
I find it unnecessary at least and an impediment at best to my printing
I build all my packages from scratch and globally prohibit dependency
on cups by having:
in my "/etc/mk.conf" file. So long as it remains an option which can
be disabled, I'm not too concerned what the default is.
There is at least one case, "lang/openjdk8", which claims cups (cups-base)
as a build dependency so at least the build host ends up with "cups-base"
This leads to an interesting corner case first reported here:
and more recently re-discovered here:
in which an installed, but inactive CUPS caused 'firefox' to hang when
trying to print.
At the very least, the option to not _use_ cups even though one must
install it should not cause catastrophic failure of applications.
|/"\ John D. Baker, KN5UKS NetBSD Darwin/MacOS X
|\ / jdbaker[snail]mylinuxisp[flyspeck]com OpenBSD FreeBSD
| X No HTML/proprietary data in email. BSD just sits there and works!
|/ \ GPGkeyID: D703 4A7E 479F 63F8 D3F4 BD99 9572 8F23 E4AD 1645
Main Index |
Thread Index |