tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Package Option naming: support to build with vs. default to build in

To: tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Package Option naming: support to build with vs. default to build in
From: Edgar Fuß <ef%math.uni-bonn.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 23:46:01 +0200

> does it need to depend on either of the packages just to have support 
> for them?
I'm not sure. The configure script seems to run some "does renderer X support 
feature Y" tests.

References:
- Package Option naming: support to build with vs. default to build in
  - From: Edgar Fuß
- Re: Package Option naming: support to build with vs. default to build in
  - From: Thomas Klausner
- Re: Package Option naming: support to build with vs. default to build in
  - From: Edgar Fuß
- Re: Package Option naming: support to build with vs. default to build in
  - From: Thomas Klausner

Prev by Date: Re: Package Option naming: support to build with vs. default to build in
Next by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Previous by Thread: Re: Package Option naming: support to build with vs. default to build in
Next by Thread: man3 location for ocaml
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index