[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Package Option naming: support to build with vs. default to build in
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:31:08PM +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> > Can you enable all renderers by default, and just make an option for
> > the default? Then users could install an alternate renderer separately
> > at a later time.
> Do you want a cups-filters package that always depends on ghostscript AND
> poppler AND cairo AND mupdf AND acroread?
No, but does it need to depend on either of the packages just to have
support for them?
Main Index |
Thread Index |