Re: fixing x11-links

["OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 06:27:38 +0900, David Holland 
<dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:36:37PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
>  > > > -.if ${X11_TYPE} == "native" && ${OPSYS} != "Cygwin" && 
> exists(${X11BASE}/lib/pkgconfig/dri.pc)
>  > > > +.if ${X11_TYPE} == "native" && ${OPSYS} != "Cygwin" && ${OPSYS} != "NetBSD" 
> && exists(${X11BASE}/lib/pkgconfig/dri.pc)
>  > > >  PKG_BUILD_OPTIONS.MesaLib+=    dri
>  > > >  .endif
>  > >
>  > >It might, but I don't consider it satisfactory. The only thing getting
>  > >in the way of building cairo with dri/drm support is x11-links.
>  >
>  > But it was not required for NetBSD, just added for OpenBSD (and not
>  > broken on NetBSD back then), then I found it was broken with
>  > Cygwin, it's the current situation.  Making exception on NetBSD is
>  > just back to original situation for NetBSD.
>  >
>  > Please refer commit log of pkgsrc/x11/libdrm/buildlink3.mk rev1.16.
>
> I'm not sure I fully understand; you're saying that the dri option was
> turned off by default for OpenBSD not because it didn't work but
> because x11-links was breaking it, and that OpenBSD should therefore
> be removed from the above test after x11-links is fixed?

I don't remember detailed situation, but
 * dri is on for OpenBSD native X.
 * some X libraries are provided with .la on OpenBSD
then dependency libraries must be buildlinked (with x11-links).

So if it cause the problem for NetBSD, please just change its condition.

>  > If you really want to Reduce mimimal requirement of libdrm from 2.4.15,
>  > you also do recursive bump from there, because packages depending on
>  > libdrm will be changed to use builtin one instead of pksrc one.
>
> Aren't any such packages going to be linked to both pkgsrc and native
> libdrm and thus broken?

Yes, same as recent fontconfig API bump.

--
OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost