[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: "make replace" when package is not already installed
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> wrote:
> kpathsea (not installed, but I need tex, and am in one of those
> delete-all-tex-and-rebuild phases due to tex's
> move-files-cause-CONFLICTs and look-sideways-hose-database personality
These sound like bugs :(.
> So I'd say this might as well be committed; it makes sense for make
> replace to fall back to just package-install if the package is not
> Does anybody think it's important for "make replace" to fail when one
> tries to replace a package that isn't installed?
I am all for having this committed.
Main Index |
Thread Index |