[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Packages with non-distributable distfiles
On 5/20/2012 18:00, Edgar Fuß wrote:
The issue is the combination of non-redistributable and missing from
Well, then call it DISTFILE_UNAVAILABLE or whatever.
Note: the package is only useful for users who *already* have the distfile
My impression was that most of the people would like those packages go away
(they're of no use to them, they break bulk builds, they get asked why the
distfile isn't available) while a few people would like it to stay because they
do have the distfile.
So why don't keep the package and mark it as "this is only useful to you if you
somehow do have the distfile"?
Or just make a stand and tell those lucky few with the distfile to keep
their own copy of the package makefiles along with the distfile (and
those are always retrievable through CVS). I don't understand this need
to cater to the minority. This packrat/hoarding approach is messy -
prune these essentially dead packages already.
Main Index |
Thread Index |