[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> wrote:
> code used by new code to visualize network performance:
> (background in http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1170)
> tahoe has a goal of being able to just download the source tarball and
> type ./setup.py foo and be able to run; this is not relevant to pkgsrc.
> However, they're running into the problem that js libraries aren't
> culturally aligned with packaging systems. I'd like to be able to say
> that Protovis is packaged already and that tahoe should just look for
> to be true. Unrelated but similar, there's openlayers.
> Does anyone have thoughts on packaging these?
Should this live in htdocs? Does setup.py do anything special?
Main Index |
Thread Index |