[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Patch name changes
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:14:12PM +0200, Filip Hajny wrote:
> > I suggest we starting from now on, we use the name
> > patch-path_relative_to_wrksrc_filename instead, i.e. run the path of
> > the name of the file to patch through
> > sed -e "s,_,__,g" -e "s,/,_,g"
> > and prefix "patch-".
> Is there any reason why e.g. comma (or something else) couldn't be used in
> place of slash in the file path, so that we could avoid problems when
> 'part/file' becomes 'part_file' and there is already 'part_file' in the
> Otherwise, I entirely agree. I've been using this approach to break out 3rd
> party one-lump patch files into LOCALPATCHES based patches.
If you look closely, the patch for a file called "file_name" is called
Does that answer your concern or not?
Main Index |
Thread Index |