Re: git copies of cvs modules available

[Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Lloyd Parkes 
<Lloyd.Parkes%ird.govt.nz@localhost> wrote:
> If we start providing git
> repositories, we may need two for each source tree, one stable repository
> that people can rsync to create their initial clone, and then a much more
> frequently updated repository to do real work with. I don't know how well
> git copes with a local repository that is an rsync copy of a remote
> repository that was being updated during the rsync operation.
>
I would say "badly". However, what would be interesting would be to
know the overhead (in transfer and in size) introduced by http vs the
git internal protocol.

 - Arnaud