"OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost> writes: > On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:57:25 +0900, Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> > wrote: > >> I haven't been running USE_DESTDIR yet, but I agree with Thomas that the >> following incanations should have the same result as without DESTDIR: >> >> make install >> make replace >> make package >> >> (and by extension, things like 'make replace package clean'.) >> >> It seems that the only change needed to get to this state is to in the >> DESTDIR case have 'install' also push the bits to /usr/pkg from the >> DESTDIR, and add install-destdir to do what install does now. Is this >> true, and if so are there objections? > > (I never use 'make replace', it's dangerous for me...) Do you think > what will be happend when 'make install-destdir' with USE_DESTDIR=no > and/or PKG_DESTDIR_SUPPORT=no packages? In that case, I think make should fail with an error.
Description: PGP signature