[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Options vs. Binary packages
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Blair Sadewitz wrote:
Another approach would be to simply decrease the number of options in
many packages, instead making them mandatory. For instance, consider
ffmpeg; IMHO it's better to build it with most of the optional
packages included by default.
pkgsrc isn't only used for software on standard workstation machines. I
use it to build binary packages which are then hacked^Wpost-processed to
used in an embedded environment. In this way I have a kernel (with
embedded ramdisk capable of updating itself and its packages) plus modules
(opera, Linux emulation, Citrix ICA client, X.org, tk/tcl, mbone tools,
rdesktop, vnc, gui for configuration, etc.) in around 40MB.
I need options to chop down features I don't need that bloat the system.
By all means have them on by default, but they don't want removing.
Main Index |
Thread Index |