tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Options vs. Binary packages

To: Dennis den Brok <d.den.brok%uni-bonn.de@localhost>
Subject: Re: Options vs. Binary packages
From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed%reedmedia.net@localhost>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:22:25 -0500 (CDT)

> I don't know whether win32-codecs are 100% redundant... maybe play
> safe and just alter PKG_SUGGESTED_OPTIONS?

Thanks for the extra set of eyes! I see I had changed the wrong one.

Also I see that mplayer-share doesn't need PKGREVISION bumped -- as it 
doesn't use the options.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Options vs. Binary packages
  - From: Blair Sadewitz

References:
- Options vs. Binary packages
  - From: Dennis den Brok
- Re: Options vs. Binary packages
  - From: Jeremy C. Reed
- Re: Options vs. Binary packages
  - From: Jeremy C. Reed
- Re: Options vs. Binary packages
  - From: Dennis den Brok

Prev by Date: Re: Options vs. Binary packages
Next by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Previous by Thread: Re: Options vs. Binary packages
Next by Thread: Re: Options vs. Binary packages
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index