tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/mk



Alistair Crooks <agc%pkgsrc.org@localhost> wrote,

> Delivered-To: ulrich.habel%gmail.com@localhost
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess 
> record for domain of 
> bounces-tech-pkg-owner-rhaen=netbsd.org%netbsd.org@localhost designates
>       204.152.190.11 as permitted sender) 
> smtp.mail=bounces-tech-pkg-owner-rhaen=netbsd.org%netbsd.org@localhost
> Delivered-To: rhaen%netbsd.org@localhost
> Delivered-To: tech-pkg%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:55:57 +0100
> From: Alistair Crooks <agc%pkgsrc.org@localhost>
> To: OBATA Akio <obache%NetBSD.org@localhost>
> Cc: tech-pkg%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/mk
> In-Reply-To: <op.uf530qxxcmitfu%ponkan.lins.jp@localhost>
> X-GPG-Fingerprint: D415 9DEB 336D E4CC CDFA  00CD 1B68 DCFC C059 6823
> X-URL: http://www.alistaircrooks.co.uk/agc.html
> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.5 
> (nef.pbox.org [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:55:58 +0200 (CEST)
> List-Id: tech-pkg
> 
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 01:27:52PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> > IMO, just a note:
> >  * There is no technical reason to create wrkdir symlink.
> 
> On the contrary - trying to figure out what happened in the build
> is a perfectly good reason for wanting an easy way to get to the
> work directory. This is especially important if some extra help
> is needed. Shell completion doesn't work too well when there is no
> symbolic link.

http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2008/07/31/msg001404.html

That might be a good reason to set it back to "no" :) This is just the
case where I discovered it when working on Solaris. Basically pkgsrc
complains about a symlink when WRKDIR isn't set in mk.conf.

Well, I think either or is fine, just make sure that we don't break
sandboxed builds on Solaris :)

btw, if you run -current on Solaris right now you won't be able to build
a single package. So, I'll vote another time for "change back to NO" :)

Regards
Uli

Attachment: pgp52ZbIHUTRM.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index