Re: dead code in netinet6 (MIP6?)

[coypu%sdf.org@localhost]

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:59:28PM +0100, Robert Swindells wrote:
> 
> coypu%sdf.org@localhost wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 09:43:23PM +0100, Robert Swindells wrote:
> >> 
> >> coypu%sdf.org@localhost wrote:
> >> >what is this about? do we want to keep it? :-)
> >> 
> >> Where ?
> >> 
> >> I have the MobileIPv6 implementation from KAME in my tree so can't do
> >> a search to see if any of it has got committed already by mistake.
> >
> >No, it wasn't committed.
> >
> >When working on other kernels, we had a rule that if it's out of tree,
> >it doesn't exist. I think it's reasonable. It's hard to consider cases
> >you don't see.
> 
> ???
> 
> I remembered that I have a checked out -8 tree that I could search.
> 
> There is some stuff in in6_src.c wrapped in MIP6 and/or NMIP that will
> have been there since the IPv6 code was imported from KAME.
> 
> I have changed it slightly to work in -current.
> 
> It might be cleaner to remove it for now and add all the MIP6 code
> in one go at some point in the future.

Anyway, no worries, just figured that dead code = code that should be
gone.