Re: so_rerror

[Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>]

> On Nov 3, 2018, at 12:23 PM, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
> 
> I think we need to mask sooptions here or with an accessor function
> when using the sysctl to write the value. It is likely not a good idea
> to set e.g. "there is an accept filter running" to on when this is a lie.
> 
> Maybe we should instead do a boolean sysctl and just set the single bit 
> in sooptions?

Agreed -- I think it's a bad idea so simply have blanket set of default socket options.  It's better to break this one out as a separate boolean.

-- thorpej