Re: so_rerror

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 06:53:49PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:

> @@ -537,6 +538,7 @@
>  	so->so_proto = prp;
>  	so->so_send = sosend;
>  	so->so_receive = soreceive;
> +	so->so_options = sooptions;
>  #ifdef MBUFTRACE
>  	so->so_rcv.sb_mowner = &prp->pr_domain->dom_mowner;
>  	so->so_snd.sb_mowner = &prp->pr_domain->dom_mowner;


I think we need to mask sooptions here or with an accessor function
when using the sysctl to write the value. It is likely not a good idea
to set e.g. "there is an accept filter running" to on when this is a lie.

Maybe we should instead do a boolean sysctl and just set the single bit 
in sooptions?

Martin