Re: Plan for improving IP_PKTINFO socket option handling

[Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih%hamartun.priv.no@localhost>]

Christos Zoulas <christos%astron.com@localhost> writes:

> This came up in a different discussion; we should pass the size around...

Thanks for fixing that -- and for committings my IP_PKTINFO changes!  I
liked the little adjustments you made to the code, there.  It does get
more readable with the reduced nesting and early resolution tweaks.

Where can I find official guidelines for coding style?

When we're sure the passing of the buffer size down from getsockopt(2)
is good, we should adjust the bit that handles getting the IP_PKTINFO
option data: the comments are no longer correct, at least.

-tih
-- 
Most people who graduate with CS degrees don't understand the significance
of Lisp.  Lisp is the most important idea in computer science.  --Alan Kay