[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: missing KERNEL_LOCK ?
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:38:30AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> writes:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 03:32:29PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> >> That looks plausibly correct.
> >> Two thoughts:
> >> Have you run with LOCKDEBUG? We have found that netbsd-6 can run
> >> with LOCKDEBUG and stay up, only about a 2x speed penalty.
> > No, I've not tried this. Indeed LOCKDEBUG causes more serialization so it
> > could hide this kind of problem.
> Perhaps, but the system not crashing with LOCKDEBUG is an important
> property to maintain. So I personally would not commit this without a
> LOCKDEBUG run.
AFAIK LOCKDEBUG doens't covers KERNEL_LOCK, but I can test it anyway.
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |