[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: missing KERNEL_LOCK ?
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 03:32:29PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> That looks plausibly correct.
> Two thoughts:
> Have you run with LOCKDEBUG? We have found that netbsd-6 can run
> with LOCKDEBUG and stay up, only about a 2x speed penalty.
No, I've not tried this. Indeed LOCKDEBUG causes more serialization so it
could hide this kind of problem.
> you are making changes to the upstream ipfilter. that's just how it
> is. But I wonder if the lock should be in the ifdef on recent netbsd;
> I do not recall when the locking rules changed.
somewhere between -5 and -6, and only for netinet (the netinet6 stack is
still running under KENREL_LOCK)
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |