David Young <dyoung%pobox.com@localhost> writes: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:39:04PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: >> Sorry, but you are basically doing something that does not conform to >> Internet standards, and that will probably require some code reading. > > It's customary to configure a small subnet for host and gateway to > share, and then to configure a route to the gateway, but is that > because an Internet standard says it should be so (and why does it say > so?) or because that is easiest or the only feasible way in the BSD > implementation? I'd say that it is irregular to expect a host (or router) to arp for and send packets to another hour/router that does not fall within the prefix. It's difficult in BSD precisely because it was irregular (and unthinkably bizarre) back in the day. So this is really about "how do you send a packet to another host on your subet", and there's no real support in standards that I know of for what to do about sending packets on a broadcast interface to hosts that are not within that interface's prefix. So perhaps I'm wrong, and it would be interesting to see standaards-track RFC text that suggests the disjoint-/32 approach is ok.
Description: PGP signature