[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: BPF_MISC+BPF_COP and BPF_COPX
On 4 August 2013 15:54, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>
> Adrian Chadd <adrian%freebsd.org@localhost> wrote:
>> I think it's slightly unfair to propose a new extension for BPF
>> without any in-tree users.
> We have in-tree user in NetBSD as mentioned in the previous email:
Ah, cool. I missed that.
>> > It provides us a capability to offload more complex packet processing.
>> > My primary user would be NPF in NetBSD, e.g. one of the operations is to
>> > lookup an IP address in a table/ipset.
> I would like to coordinate the reservation of BPF opcodes though.
That's a good idea. I have no problem with that.
Main Index |
Thread Index |