[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ifconfig v2
On Jun 11, 2013, at 8:52 PM, Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost> wrote:
>>> inet 169.254.162.222 prefixlen 16
>>> inet6 fe80::226:2dff:fef3:c8c7%wm0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
>> If you want to do that, please use
>> inet 220.127.116.11/16
>> which is more standard notation (so-called "CIDR" notation) for IPv4.
> Indeed, some programs accept it for v6 as well. But - unless you also
> propose to break noncontiguous netmasks completely - you have to be
> prepared to report the mask as other than a width if it's
Breaking noncontiguous netmasks sounds like a good idea to me.
Main Index |
Thread Index |