tech-net archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Specifying names for tap interfaces
>>>>> "Roger" == Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau%citrix.com@localhost> writes:
Roger> Michael Richardson wrote:
>>>>>>> "Roger" == Roger Pau Monne<roger.pau%citrix.com@localhost> writes:
Roger> Anything that we can control, like tap-%domid.%devid would be
Roger> good though. It doesn't have to follow any specific
Roger> nomenclature, but it will be good to be able to specify two
Roger> integers, one that corresponds to the domain id, and another
Roger> one that identifies the specific network card inside that
Roger> domain.
>> But that, really, Admins hate having %domid in the device name
>> because it screws up useful things like SNMP/mrtg on those
>> devices.
Roger> I don't really understand this, why does the name of the
Roger> interface matters regarding SNMP or mrtg? Is this a privacy
Roger> related issue?
Because, the *mrtg* graph is generally for interface "FOO" (usually
associated with virtual machine "FOO", but naturally machines can have
multiple interfaces).
There are other ways of specifying the interface, but they are generally
not stable across reboots, or restarts of the virtual machine. In
particular, ifIndex (which shows up in th4e OID) is definitely not
stable (nor should it be).
Roger> It supports being able to specify interface names in Linux
Roger> (on the domain config file), for both vif (PV) and tap (HVM),
Roger> and it has been like this for a long time I think (xend also
Roger> had this functionality).
I knew it was coming, I just wasn't sure if it had happened yet.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr%sandelman.ottawa.on.ca@localhost http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/
|device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index