tech-net archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: apparently missing locking in if_bnx.c
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 01:01:09PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 06:53:42AM -0500, Beverly Schwartz wrote:
> > I was using the tip of netbsd-6. I can test it again to be sure.
>
> You should add tests to make sure that:
> - bnx_start() is always called at splnet():
> KASSERT(curcpu()->ci_level >= IPL_NET);
> - bnx_start() is always called with KERNEL_LOCK held:
> KASSERT(ci->ci_biglock_count > 0);
make that:
KASSERT(curcpu()->ci_ilevel >= IPL_NET);
KASSERT(curcpu()->ci_biglock_count > 0);
--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index