[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: [PATCH] IP_MINTTL (was: Re: IP_RECVTTL)
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Christos Zoulas<christos%astron.com@localhost>
> In article <m2ab33czli.wl%minskim%bawi.org@localhost>,
> Min Sik Kim <minskim%bawi.org@localhost> wrote:
>>At Wed, 8 Jul 2009 19:13:30 -0400,
>>matthew sporleder <msporleder%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>>> While trying to compile liboping on netbsd I ran into a lack of
>>> IP_RECVTTL and noticed that freebsd did have this and a few other
>>> things defined in in.h:
>>> 469 #define IP_RECVTTL 65 /* bool; receive IP TTL
>>> w/dgram */
>>> 470 #define IP_MINTTL 66 /* minimum TTL for packet
>>> or drop */
>>> 471 #define IP_DONTFRAG 67 /* don't fragment packet
>>The following is a patch to add IP_MINTTL.
> commit it.
How about the IP_RECVTTL flag? Also, is it safe to define these
locally for pre-patched systems in a program, or does the rest of the
support code need to exist to be safe?
Main Index |
Thread Index |