David Young wrote:
I think that the kernel is doing the right thing. In your patch, maybe you have equated IFADDR_FIRST(ifp) with ifp->if_dl? That hasn't been true for a long time.
So something like this?
Index: sys/net/rtsock.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/net/rtsock.c,v
retrieving revision 1.125
diff -u -p -r1.125 rtsock.c
--- sys/net/rtsock.c 2 Apr 2009 21:02:06 -0000 1.125
+++ sys/net/rtsock.c 17 Apr 2009 19:51:33 -0000
@@ -1061,7 +1061,8 @@ sysctl_iflist(int af, struct rt_walkarg
}
}
IFADDR_FOREACH(ifa, ifp) {
- if (af && af != ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family)
+ if (ifa == ifp->if_dl ||
+ (af && af != ifa->ifa_addr->sa_family))
continue;
info.rti_info[RTAX_IFA] = ifa->ifa_addr;
info.rti_info[RTAX_NETMASK] = ifa->ifa_netmask;
Thanks
Roy