Re: Proposal to enable WAPBL by default for 10.0

To: "maya%netbsd.org@localhost" <maya%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Proposal to enable WAPBL by default for 10.0
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 18:20:22 -0700

> On Jul 26, 2020, at 4:20 PM, maya%netbsd.org@localhost <maya%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:
> 
> It looks like this difference is because FFS doesn't flush the disk
> cache often, but if WAPBL is enabled, it does on every log write.

Do you mean by issuing a SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE or similar command?  Be aware that there are a lot of USB->SATA bridges out there that happily ignore this command.

-- thorpej

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal to enable WAPBL by default for 10.0
  - From: nia

References:
- Proposal to enable WAPBL by default for 10.0
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: Proposal to enable WAPBL by default for 10.0
  - From: David Holland
- Re: Proposal to enable WAPBL by default for 10.0
  - From: Michał Górny
- Re: Proposal to enable WAPBL by default for 10.0
  - From: David Holland
- Re: Proposal to enable WAPBL by default for 10.0
  - From: maya

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal to enable WAPBL by default for 10.0
Next by Date: Re: Proposal to enable WAPBL by default for 10.0
Previous by Thread: Re: Proposal to enable WAPBL by default for 10.0
Next by Thread: Re: Proposal to enable WAPBL by default for 10.0
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index