Re: Removing PF

[Piotr Meyer <aniou%smutek.pl@localhost>]

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 01:21:27PM +0100, Johnny Billquist wrote:

> Are you saying that NPF is not being updated or supported?
> Should we maybe remove it?
> Having broken code around for 8 years without anyone even much noticing
> (except you maybe) or fixing it would suggest the code is rather rotten, and
> little used.
> 
> Only half a :-) intended.

Do you think that there is any equality between remote-triggered 
crash and lack of specific feature? BTW: you joke makes strong 
argument against PF - there wasn't push for updating NPF features
because they already works in - as we NOW know - buggy and insecure
PF.

PS. Looks like Open, with larger userbase hasn't similar objections 
before pruning cumbersome code.

-- 
Piotr 'aniou' Meyer