Re: atf for atomic_ops(3)

[Tetsuya Isaki <isaki%pastel-flower.jp@localhost>]

At Sun, 17 Feb 2019 08:48:01 +0100,
Martin Husemann wrote:
> > I wrote atf tests for atomic_ops(3).
> > These does not test the atomicity but can find a easy bug.
> > Is this ok to commit?
> > (I know there is a similar path tests/lib/libc/sync but
> > I think it's better to not merge)
> 
> Why not?
> 
> Or we could remove all ops from tests/lib/libc/sync that are covered in this
> tests, and if that test covers all, remove tests/lib/libc/sync completly.
> 
> The rationaly for tests/lib/libc/sync was just to spot missing symbols, if
> we even test the function, that is obviously better.

Ah, that makes my understanding clear.

Well then, I add atomic_ops part this time.  And I will
prepare sync_* tests and add them in tests/lib/libc/atomic
(in order to replace tests/lib/libc/sync).

Thanks,
---
Tetsuya Isaki <isaki%pastel-flower.jp@localhost / isaki%NetBSD.org@localhost>