Re: atf for atomic_ops(3)

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 04:43:52PM +0900, Tetsuya Isaki wrote:
> I wrote atf tests for atomic_ops(3).
> These does not test the atomicity but can find a easy bug.
> Is this ok to commit?
> (I know there is a similar path tests/lib/libc/sync but
> I think it's better to not merge)

Why not?

Or we could remove all ops from tests/lib/libc/sync that are covered in this
tests, and if that test covers all, remove tests/lib/libc/sync completly.

The rationaly for tests/lib/libc/sync was just to spot missing symbols, if
we even test the function, that is obviously better.

Martin