tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice

On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:15:55PM +0000, wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 02:10:38PM -0700, John Nemeth wrote:
> >      Saying, "we are being stupid," could most definitely be an
> > insult to the people that wrote the code in question.  I seriously
> > doubt that we are being stupid in this case.
> Probably. I'm just upset, sorry.
> I like the idea of delay.

Wasting CPU time playing with your thumbs is my idea of stupid...


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index