Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:15:55PM +0000, maya%netbsd.org@localhost wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 02:10:38PM -0700, John Nemeth wrote:
> >      Saying, "we are being stupid," could most definitely be an
> > insult to the people that wrote the code in question.  I seriously
> > doubt that we are being stupid in this case.
> 
> Probably. I'm just upset, sorry.
> I like the idea of delay.

Wasting CPU time playing with your thumbs is my idea of stupid...

Joerg