tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice

On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 08:38:24PM +0000, wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 01:16:15PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > The solution is to implement "tickless kernel". It is not that difficult.
> It looks like we are always descheduling the thread, not jut because we
> got a clock tick. even a tickless kernel won't help stupid.

to clarify, I mean, "it won't help, because we are being stupid", not
as an insult.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index