Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice

[maya%netbsd.org@localhost]

On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 08:38:24PM +0000, maya%netbsd.org@localhost wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 01:16:15PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > The solution is to implement "tickless kernel". It is not that difficult.
> 
> It looks like we are always descheduling the thread, not jut because we
> got a clock tick. even a tickless kernel won't help stupid.

to clarify, I mean, "it won't help, because we are being stupid", not
as an insult.