tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice

On Jul 2,  8:41pm, wrote:
} On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 08:38:24PM +0000, wrote:
} > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 01:16:15PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
} > > The solution is to implement "tickless kernel". It is not that difficult.
} > 
} > It looks like we are always descheduling the thread, not jut because we
} > got a clock tick. even a tickless kernel won't help stupid.
} to clarify, I mean, "it won't help, because we are being stupid", not
} as an insult.

     Saying, "we are being stupid," could most definitely be an
insult to the people that wrote the code in question.  I seriously
doubt that we are being stupid in this case.

}-- End of excerpt from

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index