tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice

To: Christos Zoulas <christos%astron.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
From: maya%netbsd.org@localhost
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 20:38:24 +0000

On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 01:16:15PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> The solution is to implement "tickless kernel". It is not that difficult.

It looks like we are always descheduling the thread, not jut because we
got a clock tick. even a tickless kernel won't help stupid.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
  - From: Michael van Elst
- Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
  - From: maya

References:
- nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
  - From: Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
  - From: Christos Zoulas

Prev by Date: Re: Go on NetBSD needs love
Next by Date: Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
Previous by Thread: Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
Next by Thread: Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index