Re: lwp resource limit

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <20120605013242.GA7273%panix.com@localhost>,
Thor Lancelot Simon  <tls%panix.com@localhost> wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:13:09PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> 
>> That is a good idea! The only problem with it is that ps -sx and the sysctl
>> limit will not match (the limit will be lower than the sysctl number by the
>> number of processes). It does have the nice property though that the process
>> gets created anyway, as it is now (counting the limit).
>> 
>> It is a very simple change, and if people prefer it, I will do it.
>
>I think it's truly elegant.  Do it!

I'll need to burn a bit in the lwp flags to indicate that exit should not
decrease the count, or hardcode not to do it for lid == 1. Which one do
you prefer?

christos