Re: lwp resource limit

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:13:09PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> 
> That is a good idea! The only problem with it is that ps -sx and the sysctl
> limit will not match (the limit will be lower than the sysctl number by the
> number of processes). It does have the nice property though that the process
> gets created anyway, as it is now (counting the limit).
> 
> It is a very simple change, and if people prefer it, I will do it.

I think it's truly elegant.  Do it!

Thor