Re: ncr53c9x fallout from asserting kernel lock in scsipi_base

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:39:08PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> if ncr53c9x is not MP-safe, it should be running under the KERNEL_LOCK
> itself, and so should not need to take it before calling back in
> scsipi.

Where is that dealt with? I.e. where is the lock taken before the attach
function is called?

Martin