[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ncr53c9x fallout from asserting kernel lock in scsipi_base
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:30:56PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:17:42PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > assuming ncr53c9x is MP-safe, it is correct.
> Just out of curiosity: assuming it isn't, what would be different?
if ncr53c9x is not MP-safe, it should be running under the KERNEL_LOCK
itself, and so should not need to take it before calling back in
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |