tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: ncr53c9x fallout from asserting kernel lock in scsipi_base

To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: ncr53c9x fallout from asserting kernel lock in scsipi_base
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:30:56 +0100

On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:17:42PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> assuming ncr53c9x is MP-safe, it is correct.

Just out of curiosity: assuming it isn't, what would be different?

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ncr53c9x fallout from asserting kernel lock in scsipi_base
  - From: Manuel Bouyer

References:
- ncr53c9x fallout from asserting kernel lock in scsipi_base
  - From: Julian Coleman
- Re: ncr53c9x fallout from asserting kernel lock in scsipi_base
  - From: Manuel Bouyer

Prev by Date: Re: ncr53c9x fallout from asserting kernel lock in scsipi_base
Next by Date: Re: ncr53c9x fallout from asserting kernel lock in scsipi_base
Previous by Thread: Re: ncr53c9x fallout from asserting kernel lock in scsipi_base
Next by Thread: Re: ncr53c9x fallout from asserting kernel lock in scsipi_base
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index