[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: A simple cpufreq(9)
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:36:54PM -0400, Mouse wrote:
> > (I think it would probably be more effective, if not as
> > retro-attractive, to define a new 36-bit architecture... this would
> > make a bunch of routine stuff easier and allow concentrating on the
> > 36-bit issues.)
> Good point. Who wants to draw up an architecture? If nobody else
> does, I'd be happy to create and float a strawman draft.
I certainly could, although I don't know enough about hardware
implementation to avoid doing stupid stuff.
But, maybe this should get out of the cpufreq(9) thread...
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |