Re: A simple cpufreq(9)

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:36:54PM -0400, Mouse wrote:
 > > (I think it would probably be more effective, if not as
 > > retro-attractive, to define a new 36-bit architecture... this would
 > > make a bunch of routine stuff easier and allow concentrating on the
 > > 36-bit issues.)
 > 
 > Good point.  Who wants to draw up an architecture?  If nobody else
 > does, I'd be happy to create and float a strawman draft.

I certainly could, although I don't know enough about hardware
implementation to avoid doing stupid stuff. 

But, maybe this should get out of the cpufreq(9) thread...

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost