[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Iain Hibbert <plunky%rya-online.net@localhost>
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
>> > We can discard the pseudo-devices concept, if need be.
>> In what sense?
>> As I explained in the first post, pseudo device is strict definition;
>> it has no parent in terms of physiical topology. It may have parents
>> in terms of components. I've very carefully investigated those. I
>> strictly defferenciate them. Please re-read the first post in this
> If a device has no parent, just attach it at root (similar to mainbus*),
> with parent == NULL, or even pseudo* at root, and pseudo-dev* at pseudo?
> It is a frustration when building a 'software' device that there are some
> differences between the methodology of configuration, and it is not
> possible to pass configuration arguments from userland into the device
> attach routine..
Could you show one (or more) real example(s) / senario(s)? That would
help to understand problems & clarify requirements...
Main Index |
Thread Index |